Perceived Stress and Burnout: The Mediating Role of Psychological, Professional Self-Care and Job Satisfaction as Preventive Factorsin Helping Professions

Authors

  • Monika Hricova monika.hricova@upjs.sk
    Department of Psychology, Pavol Jozef Šafarik University in Košice Moyzesova 9, SK-040 59 Košice, Slovak Republic
  • Jana Nezkusilova Pavol Jozef Šafarik University in Košiced; Slovak Republic
  • Beata Raczova Pavol Jozef Šafarik University in Košice; Slovak Republic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5708/EJMH.15.2020.1.1

Keywords:

stress, burnout, job satisfaction, self-care, helping profession, social service, mental health

Abstract

Background: Stress and burnout are among the common causes of absenteeism and fluctu - ation of staff in European workplaces. Therefore, the demand for understanding the predictors of burnout in high risk professions has been growing. The aim of this study is to explore the link between perceived stress and the three dimensions of burnout (emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment) while considering the potential mediating role of self-care and job satisfaction that may prevent the transformation of stress into burnout.

Methods: A randomly selected group of Slovak social service professionals (N = 689; 618 women) from institutions in 8 districts in Slovakia described their levels of perceived stress, burnout, performed self-care and job satisfaction in self-reported questionnaires.

Results: The relationship between stress and emotional exhaustion is solely mediated by certain aspects of job satisfaction: salary, nature of work, and operating procedures. The relationship between stress and depersonalization is mediated by the nature of work, psychological self-care, and professional self-care. However, professional self-care does not prevent but rather facilitates the development of depersonalization in times of high perceived stress. The relationship between stress and personal accomplishment is mediated by psychological and professional self-care as well as by three factors of job satisfaction: co-workers, nature of work and job benefits. When stress increases, satisfaction with co-workers and nature of work prevent the decrease of personal accomplishment. However, job benefits, with increasing stress, may be related to a decrease in personal accomplishment at work.

Conclusion: Satisfaction with salary, nature of work, operating procedures and co-workers as well as psychological self-care may prevent the further development of burnout in times of high stress. Yet, professional self-care and job benefits may, in times of increased stress, potentially lead towards specific aspects of burnout (depersonalization and reduction of personal accomplishment).

References

Abbass-Dick, J., Stern, S. B., Nelson, L. E., Watson, W., & Dennis, C.-L. (2015). Coparenting breastfeeding support and exclusive breastfeeding: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics, 135(1), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1416

Antawati, D. I., & Purnomo, B. R. (2023). Indonesian translation and validation of Co-Parenting Relationship Scale Brief Version (Brief-CRS). Qubahan Academic Journal, 3(4), 342–351. https://doi.org/10.58429/qaj.v3n4a183

Archer‐Kuhn, B., Saini, M., Hughes, J., Tam, D., & Trudgill, D. I. N. (2023). A survey of mothers' experiences of shared parenting and domestic violence. Family Court Review, 61(2), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12715

Barzel, M., & Reid, G. J. (2011). A preliminary examination of the psychometric properties of the Coparenting Questionnaire and the Diabetes-Specific Coparenting Questionnaire in families of children with type I diabetes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 36(5), 606–617. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsq103

Beckmeyer, J. J., Coleman, M., & Ganong, L. H. (2014). Postdivorce coparenting typologies and children's adjustment. Family Relations, 63(4), 526–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12086

Beckmeyer, J. J., Ganong, L. H., Coleman, M., & Markham, M. S. (2017). Experiences with Coparenting Scale: A semantic differential measure of postdivorce coparenting satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues, 38(10), 1471–1490. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x16634764

Camisasca, E., Miragoli, S., & Di Blasio, P. (2014). Is the relationship between marital adjustment and parenting stress mediated or moderated by parenting alliance? Europe's Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v10i2.724

Camisasca, E., Miragoli, S., Di Blasio, P., & Feinberg, M. (2019). Co-parenting mediates the influence of marital satisfaction on child adjustment: The conditional indirect effect by parental empathy. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1271-5

Carvalho, T. R., Barham, E. J., de Souza, C. D., Böing, E., Crepaldi, M. A., & Vieira, M. L. (2018). Cross-cultural adaptation of an instrument to assess coparenting: Coparenting Relationship Scale. Psico-USF, 23(2), 215–227. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-82712018000200215&nrm=iso

Cox, M. J., & Paley, B. (2003). Understanding families as systems. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(5), 193–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01259

Danis, I., Gervai, J., & Pilinszki, A. (2019). The Hungarian translation of the Coparenting Relationship Scale. Available here: https://semmelweis.hu/mental/files/2025/02/Feinberg_Coparenting_Relationship_Scale_HU-1.pdf

Dumitriu, C. G., Dudu, A., & Butac, L. M. (2022). Validation of the Romanian version of coparenting relationship scale. International Research Journal of Public and Environmental Health, 9(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.15739/irjpeh.22.004

Dunn, O. J. (1964). Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics, 6(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1964.10490181

Favez, N., Tissot, H., Golay, P., Max, A., Feinberg, M. E., & Bader, M. (2021). French adaptation of the Coparenting Relationship Scale: A scale for the assessment of the interparental relationship. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 37(6), 433–439. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000633

Feinberg, M. E. (2003). The internal structure and ecological context of coparenting: A framework for research and intervention. Parenting: Science and Practice, 3(2), 95–131. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327922PAR0302_01

Feinberg, M. E., Boring, J., Le, Y., Hostetler, M. L., Karre, J., Irvin, J., & Jones, D. E. (2020). Supporting military family resilience at the transition to parenthood: A randomized pilot trial of an online version of family foundations. Family Relations, 69(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12415

Feinberg, M. E., Brown, L. D., & Kan, M. L. (2012). A multi-domain self-report measure of coparenting. Parenting: Science and Practice, 12(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2012.638870

Ferraro, A. J., Lucier-Greer, M., & Oehme, K. (2018). Psychometric evaluation of the Multidimensional Co-Parenting Scale for dissolved relationships. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27, 2780–2796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1124-2

Finzi-Dottan, R., & Cohen, O. (2014). Predictors of parental communication and cooperation among divorcing spouses. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23, 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-012-9684-z

Garcia-Huidobro, D., Diaspro-Higuera, M. O., Palma, D., Palma, R., Ortega, L., Shlafer, R., Wieling, E., Piehler, T., August, G., Svetaz, M. V., Borowsky, I. W., & Allen, M. L. (2019). Adaptive recruitment and parenting interventions for immigrant Latino families with adolescents. Prevention Science, 20(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0898-1

Gillis, A., & Roskam, I. (2019). Development and validation of the Partner Parental Support Questionnaire. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 8(3), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/cfp0000123

Gillis, A., & Roskam, I. (2020). Regulation between daily exhaustion and support in parenting: A dyadic perspective. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44(3), 226–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419868536

Goldenberg, I., Stanton, M., & Goldenberg, H. (2017). Family therapy: An overview (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Ju, J., Ye, P., & Bian, Y. (2023). Psychometric properties of the Coparenting Relationship Scale in Chinese parents. Family Relations, 72(4), 1694–1708. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12746

Kenny, D. A. (2024, October 6). Measuring Model Fit. http://davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm

Konold, T. R., & Abidin, R. R. (2001). Parenting alliance: A multifactor perspective. Assessment, 8(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319110100800105

Lamela, D., Castro, M., & Figueiredo, B. (2013). Parenting alliance measure: A Portuguese validation and development of a short-form version. Archives of Clinical Psychiatry, 40(6), 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-60832013000600002

Lamela, D., Figueiredo, B., Bastos, A., & Feinberg, M. (2016). Typologies of post-divorce coparenting and parental well-being, parenting quality and children’s psychological adjustment. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 47, 716–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-015-0604-5

Lamela, D., Figueiredo, B., Jongenelen, I., Morais, A., & Simpson, J. A. (2020). Coparenting and relationship satisfaction in mothers: The moderating role of sociosexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49, 861–870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01548-2

Lamela, D., & Jongenelen, A. M. I. (2018). Validação psicométrica da Escala da Relação Coparental em mães portuguesas [Psychometric randomization of the Coparental Relationship Scale in Portuguese mothers]. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 36(3), 585–600. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1794-47242018000300585&nrm=iso

Láng, A. (2018). Mama Mach and Papa Mach: Parental machiavellianism in relation to dyadic coparenting and adolescents’ perception of parental behaviour. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i1.1474

Lee, J.-K., Feinberg, M. E., & Wells, M. B. (2021). The Swedish Brief Coparenting Relationship Scale: Psychometrics and concurrent validity among primiparous and multiparous fathers. Family Relations, 70(3), 823–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12503

Margolin, G., Gordis, E. B., & John, R. S. (2001). Coparenting: a link between marital conflict and parenting in two-parent families. Journal of Family Psychology, 15(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.15.1.3

McDaniel, B. T., Teti, D. M., & Feinberg, M. E. (2017). Assessing coparenting relationships in daily life: The Daily Coparenting Scale (D-Cop). Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26, 2396–2411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0762-0

McHale, J. P. (1995). Coparenting and triadic interactions during infancy: The roles of marital distress and child gender. Developmental Psychology, 31(6), 985–996. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.31.6.985

Mikolajczak, M., Raes, M.-E., Avalosse, H., & Roskam, I. (2018). Exhausted Parents: Sociodemographic, Child-Related, Parent-Related, Parenting and Family-Functioning Correlates of Parental Burnout. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(2), 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0892-4

Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Harvard University Press.

Pedro, M. F., & Ribeiro, M. T. (2015). Portuguese adaptation of the coparenting questionnaire: Confirmatory factor analysis, validity and reliability. Psicologia, Reflexão e Crítica, 28(1), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7153.201528113

Pruett, M. K., Alschech, J., & Saini, M. (2021). The impact of coparenting on mothers’ COVID-19-related stressors. Social Sciences, 10(8), Article 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10080311

Roskam, I., Brianda, M.-E., & Mikolajczak, M. (2018). A step forward in the conceptualization and measurement of parental burnout: The Parental Burnout Assessment (PBA). Frontiers in Psychology 9, Article 758. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00758

Saini, M., Pruett, M. K., Alschech, J., & Sushchyk, A. R. (2019). A pilot study to assess coparenting across family structures (CoPAFS). Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28, 1392–1401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01370-3

Sherrard, A., & Tan, C. C. (2022). Feeding coparenting: Associations with coercive control, structure-based, and autonomy-promoting food parenting. Appetite, 170, Article 105879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105879

Tan, C. C., Lumeng, J. C., & Miller, A. L. (2019). Development and preliminary validation of a feeding coparenting scale (FCS). Appetite, 139, 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.04.020

Teti, D. M., Crosby, B., McDaniel, B. T., Shimizu, M., & Whitesell, C. J. (2015). X. Marital and emotional adjustment in mothers and infant sleep arrangements during the first six months. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 80(1), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12150

Teubert, D., & Pinquart, M. (2011). The coparenting inventory for parents and adolescents (CI-PA). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(3), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000068

Zimmermann, G., Antonietti, J.-P., Sznitman, G. A., Petegem, S. V., & Darwiche, J. (2022). The French version of the coparenting inventory for parents and adolescents (CI-PA): Psychometric properties and a cluster analytic approach. Journal of Family Studies, 28(2), 652–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2020.1749714

Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.

Walker, D. A., & Smith, T. J. (2016). Computing robust, bootstrap-adjusted fit indices for use with nonnormal data. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175616671365

Published 2020-06-15

How to Cite

Hricova, M., Nezkusilova, J., & Raczova, B. (2020). Perceived Stress and Burnout: The Mediating Role of Psychological, Professional Self-Care and Job Satisfaction as Preventive Factorsin Helping Professions. European Journal of Mental Health, 15(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.5708/EJMH.15.2020.1.1